By Michael Collins | More Articles by Michael Collins
Fukushima, on the northeast of Japan’s largest island, is vulnerable to earthquakes and tsunamis. From 1971, the area hosted the Daiichi nuclear plant. Based on global appraisals of tsunamis, the facility was built 10 metres above sea level. The commercial plant and others ensured nuclear energy supplied 30% of Japan’s power needs.[1]
That is until an earthquake of magnitude 9.0 on the Richter scale struck in 2011. An ocean surge, which peaked offshore at 23 metres, was still 15 metres high when it swamped three reactors at the Daiichi plant. Radioactive material escaped for six days. More than 2,300 people died and over 100,000 were evacuated.[2] Japan was paralysed by what the chairman of a parliamentary inquiry described as “a profoundly man-made disaster”.[3]
Tokyo reacted to the alarm of a public who watched on TV as the tsunami smashed into land. Within a year, only one of Japan’s 54 nuclear reactors was operating.
Enthusiasm for nuclear power, which reached a peak of 17% of global energy production in 1996,[4] dimmed around the world.[5] Germany immediately decided to phase out its 17 nuclear plants by 2022. Only three remain but it looks like Europe’s energy crisis could delay their closure. In the rest of Europe, the drive to nuclear power stalled such that Italy, Lithuania and nearby Kazakhstan have ditched nuclear while Finland in March opened the continent’s first new nuclear plant in 15 years. The US has opened only one reactor (in 2016) since 1996.
Reduce one risk but still face another. That danger is climate change. The UN-overseen Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change warned in April the world is “at a crossroads” in its quest to halve emissions by 2030 to limit the rise in the earth’s temperature.[6] The obstacles? Voters oppose carbon taxes. Renewable energy is struggling to match fossil fuels as a source of ‘baseload’ power on reliability and cost. Declining investment in fossil fuels has boosted hydrocarbon prices. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February further bolstered oil and gas prices while exposing Europe’s reliance on Russian energy as a liability. ‘Energy security’ has gained renewed political significance.
What to do? A large part of the answer could be nuclear energy, which is generated in a process known as fission – when uranium or plutonium atoms are split to release heat that makes steam to spin turbines.[7] Even though radioactive waste is produced during fission that can last forever,[8] policymakers are talking of adding to the 439 reactors in operation across 32 countries (while another 54 reactors are being built) that still supply about 10% of the world’s energy needs.[9]
The talk is generating action. The US in April announced a US$6 billion effort to prevent more closures among the country’s 94 reactors sprinkled across 56 plants that make the US the world’s largest generator of nuclear power. Since 2013, 12 US reactors have closed ‘early’ and another 11 reactors are scheduled to shut by 2025.[10] Nuclear power, first tapped in the US in 1958, has supplied about 20% of US electricity generation since 1990.[11]
Europe too is reemphasising nuclear. The UK in April said it would build as many as eight new nuclear plants by 2030.[12] In February before Ukraine was invaded, French President Emmanuel Macron said the world’s second-most nuclear-powered country (56 reactors that supply 70% of the country’s electricity) needed 14 new reactors by 2050.[13]Earlier the same month, the European Commission added nuclear energy to a list of sustainable energy sources that are valid replacements for fossil fuels.[14] In July, the European Parliament backed the EC decision.[15] Asia hosted all the world’s new nuclear capacity in 2021 and more is coming.[16]
It’s easy to see why leaders are attracted to nuclear energy. As long as countries can source uranium or plutonium, the nuclear option offers energy self-sufficiency and is the lowest-cost greenhouse-gas-free energy – one that is cheaper than all but the lowest-cost fossil fuels. OECD analysis, which assumes long-lasting nuclear plants will spread fixed costs and adds a carbon price of US$30 per tonne of CO2 onto the cost of fossil fuels, estimates nuclear energy could cost as little as US$30 a megawatt hour compared with US$45 for gas and US$75 for coal.[17]
Two promising developments could make nuclear more appealing. The first is the coming of commercial mini-nuclear reactors.[18] These mini-reactors would produce between 300 megawatts (small) and 700 megawatts (medium) of power compared with at least 1,000 MW electrical (MWe) produced by standard-sized reactors.
The advantages of mini-reactors are lower initial capital costs, less-complex design and that they take only four years to build rather than the decade needed for standard facilities. Mini-reactors can be built and shipped, thus are a better option for remote areas. They are safer because they require no manpower or electricity to shut down.[19] They produce less waste. They are cheaper to decommission. The International Atomic Energy Agency says there are about 50 designs for mini-reactors and four are close to being finished in Argentina, China and Russia.[20] Rolls-Royce says it can have 470 MWe mini-reactors connected to the UK grid by 2029.[21]
The second development is nuclear fusion. Whereas in nuclear fission an atom is split, fusion is combining atoms (using special hydrogen, deuterium and tritium as fuel). When fusion occurs, the difference in mass between nuclei and the newly formed heavier-but-lower-mass atom is released as energy. It takes special machines (tokamaks) or lasers to generate the intense heat and powerful magnetic forces required to produce an energy so powerful that one litre of fusion fuel matches 55,000 barrels of oil for energy.[22]
Breakthroughs are occurring in mimicking the energy source of the Sun and stars. In the UK in February, a fusion reactor produced a world record of 59 megajoules of heat energy over five seconds, more than double the previous record of 22 megajoules set in 1997.[23] In the US last September, a superconducting magnet needed in fusion broke magnetic field strength records during trials.[24] A month earlier in the US, laser light created enough heat to generate a record yield of laser fusion; 10 quadrillion watts of fusion power for 100 trillionths of a second.[25]
Aside from producing greenhouse-gas-free energy, fusion comes with two other notable advantages. One is that fusion eradicates the risk of a nuclear meltdown because, if disturbed, the process stops. The other is that no radioactive waste is produced. Fusion research is expensive, however, and advances whereby fusion reactors offer the world affordable power seem far off and might never happen.
That’s the best hope too for the devastation that nuclear energy risks. Accidents that include Three Mile Island in the US in 1979, Chernobyl in the former Soviet Union in 1986 and Fukushima are blamed on human error. A possible calamity occurred in March when Russian shelling started a fire at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant in Ukraine, which with six reactors is Europe’s largest. The incident highlighted the vulnerability of nuclear facilities to war, terrorism, suicidal rage or rogue states turning a nuclear plant into a military base, as Russia has now done with Zaporizhzhia.[26] Many say ageing nuclear facilities pose a threat. Nearby Germans have long had concerns about the state of the Tihange nuclear plant in Belgium. The regional German government has called for the plant to be closed.[27]
Nuclear energy’s risk tied to the internet age is cybersecurity. The US and Israel in 2010 used Stuxnet malware to interfere with Iran’s Natanz plant while a nuclear plant in Germany was reported to have suffered a “disruptive” cyberattack about a decade ago.[28] While the threat might be exaggerated by opponents of nuclear energy, it adds to political challenges of gaining public support for the nuclear option.[29]
Even with all the risks, nuclear energy is an established source of power that will gain traction as an answer for climate change, especially if more technological leaps are made. Nuclear energy might be most notable for how its adoption will vary across countries as communities judge their tolerance for the risks surrounding the most-promising energy solution to mitigate global warming.
To be sure, nuclear is not touted as the sole solution for climate change. Leaps in renewable technology or its economics could undermine the need for nuclear. But the reverse could apply too. The shift to more nuclear could take too long to contain the rise in the earth’s temperature to 2 degrees Celsius. Nuclear energy, with its huge initial investment, might never match the lowest-cost fossil fuels, especially if plants are excessively regulated to soothe public concerns about safety. Some countries such as Australia and Germany are against nuclear though the energy crisis could change that.[30] Russia exports nuclear technology so its isolation might slow the industry’s development. Any nuclear-building spree comes with risks and no doubt cost overruns (a problem too when upgrading ageing facilities). Against this, only three notable accidents in more than six decades is a fair safety record for any industry.
Energy security is what gives nuclear energy fresh appeal. Expect more policymakers to push for nuclear. It’s just that the next nuclear mishap – and human error, even malevolence, almost guarantees one – might, Fukushima-style, set back the best option to mitigate climate change on every measure but safety.
Tokamak is a Russian acronym that stands for the ‘toroidal chamber with magnetic coils’ that was developed in the Soviet Union in the late 1960s. The machine contains a large doughnut-shaped vacuum chamber where a few grams of hydrogen fuel are heated to 150 million degrees Celsius to form a substance known as plasma. This substance allows electrons to roam between different nuclei so they can collide and fuse. The challenges include having sufficient plasma particle density to increase the likelihood that collisions occur and enough confinement time to hold the plasma, which has a propensity to expand, within a defined volume. Within the tokamak, magnetic fields are used to confine and control the plasma.[31]
The process is seeking to capitalise on the insights of UK physicist Arthur Eddington (1882-1944).[32] Eddington observed that four hydrogen atoms weigh more than one helium atom. He surmised that if four hydrogen nuclei were fused then some mass must be lost in the process. According to Einstein’s famous equation E=MC2, that lost mass must become energy that amounts to the mass lost multiplied by the speed of light. Eddington’s brilliance, as revealed in his book Internal constitution of the stars in 1925, was he deduced that hydrogen crashing into hydrogen to form helium under immense gravitational forces is how the Sun and stars produce energy (shine).[33]
The hope of many scientists nowadays is that nuclear fusion is the solution to climate change, even the world’s energy needs. Many have tried since the explosion of a hydrogen bomb in 1952 to crack nuclear fusion as a source of power.
The world’s biggest experiment underway to achieve nuclear fusion is the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor, or ITER, Project that groups China, the EU, India, Japan, Korea, Russia and the US.
ITER’s first plasma experiment is scheduled for 2025, 15 years after building the facilities began on a site in the south of France. With 10 times the plasma volume of the largest machine operating now, the ITER tokamak is designed to move on from small-scale fusion experiments.
The key quest is to get fusion to reach the point where the energy output from the fusion reaction matches the energy needed to create the conditions that sustain the fusion reaction. A later goal of ITER is to attain 10 times the energy output, which would mean that 50 megawatts of heating power could become 500 megawatts of fusion power.[34]
If scientists at ITER or elsewhere achieve these and other feats, nuclear fusion could well power the world. No breakthroughs away from ITER appear imminent while the ITER results won’t be known for decades and might prove fruitless. In the meantime, nuclear fission conducted in mini-reactors might be the best option for those countries willing to risk using nuclear power to combat climate change.
Number of nuclear reactors by country
[1] World Nuclear Association. ‘Fukushima Daiichi disaster.’ Updated April 2021. world-nuclear.org/information-library/safety-and-security/safety-of-plants/fukushima-daiichi-accident.aspx
[2] The earthquake and tsunami are estimated to have killed nearly 20,000 people.
[3] The National Diet of Japan. ‘Official report of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission.’ 2012. Chairman Kiyoshi Kurokawa. Page 9. web.archive.org/web/20120710075620/http://naiic.go.jp/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/NAIIC_report_lo_res.pdf
[4] Britannica. ‘Nuclear power.’ britannica.com/technology/nuclear-power. See also International Atomic Energy Agency. ‘Nuclear power status in 1996.’ 24 April 1997. iaea.org/newscenter/pressreleases/nuclear-power-status-1996
[5] See Bulletin of Atomic Scientists. ‘Nuclear power and the public.’ 3 August 2011. thebulletin.org/2011/08/nuclear-power-and-the-public/ t
[6] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Sixth assessment report. Media release. ‘The evidence is clear: The time for action is now. We can halve emissions by 2030.’ 4 April 2022. ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/resources/press/press-release/
[7] See ‘Nuclear 101: How does a nuclear reactor work?’ US Department of Energy. 29 March 2021. energy.gov/ne/articles/nuclear-101-how-does-nuclear-reactor-work
[8] Plutonium-239 has a half-life of 24,000 years while strontium-90 and cesium-137 have half-lives of about 30 years (half the radioactivity will decay in 30 years). See US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Last reviewed 23 July 2019. nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/radwaste.html
[9] IAEA. ‘The database on nuclear power reactors.’ World statistics. These reactors amount to 393,818 megawatt electrical total net installed capacity, while those being built promise 53,744 MWe more capacity. In Asia, countries building reactors are China (16 under construction), India (six), Japan (two to add to 33 operational reactors), and Korea (four). Two more countries are poised to host nuclear power when the plants under construction are built. Last updated 18 July 2022. pris.iaea.org/pris/
[10] US Department of Energy. ‘DOE seeks applications, bids of $6 billion civil nuclear credit program.’ 19 April 2022. energy.gov/articles/doe-seeks-applications-bids-6-billion-civil-nuclear-credit-program
[11] US Energy Information Administration. ‘Nuclear explained. US nuclear industry.’ Last updated 21 April 2021. Figures are for the end of 2020. eia.gov/energyexplained/nuclear/us-nuclear-industry.php
[12] BBC. ‘Energy strategy: UK plans eight new nuclear reactors to boost production.’ 7 April 2022. bbc.com/news/business-61010605. See UK government. ‘Nuclear energy: What you need to know.’ 6 April 2022. gov.uk/government/news/nuclear-energy-what-you-need-to-know
[13] France 24 news services hosting article by Agence France-Presse. ‘Macron calls for 14 new reactors in nuclear ‘renaissance’. 10 February 2022. france24.com/en/live-news/20220210-macron-calls-for-14-new-reactors-in-nuclear-renaissance
[14] European Commission. ‘EU Taxonomy: Commission presents Complementary Climate Delegated Act to accelerate decarbonisation.’ 2 February 2022. ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_711
[15] European Parliament. ‘Taxonomy: MEPs do not object to inclusion of gas and nuclear activities.’ 6 July 2022. europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20220701IPR34365/taxonomy-meps-do-not-object-to-inclusion-of-gas-and-nuclear-activities
[16] IAEA. ‘Nuclear power reactors in the world.’ 2022 edition. pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/RDS-2-42_web.pdf. Page 2.
[17] Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development with the International Energy Agency and the Nuclear Energy Agency. ‘Projected costs of generating electricity 2020 edition.’ Page 14. oecd-nea.org/upload/docs/application/pdf/2020-12/egc-2020_2020-12-09_18-26-46_781.pdf. See World Nuclear Org. ‘Economics of nuclear power.’ Updated September 2021. world-nuclear.org/information-library/economic-aspects/economics-of-nuclear-power.aspx
[18] The US military first used smaller reactors in 1962. World-nuclear.org. ‘Small nuclear power reactors.’ Updated December 2022. world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/nuclear-power-reactors/small-nuclear-power-reactors.aspx
[19] TIME. ‘As Putin threatens nuclear disaster, Europe learns to embrace nuclear energy again.’ 22 April 2022. time.com/6169164/ukraine-nuclear-energy-europe/. See ‘Table 1. Safety enhancement and cost reduction benefit-challenges analysis.’ Page 16. International Atomic Energy Agency TECDOC series. ‘Benefits and challenges of small modular fast reactors.’ 2021. pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/TE-1972web.pdf
[20] International Atomic Energy Agency. ‘Small modular reactors.’ iaea.org/topics/small-modular-reactors
[21] ‘Green light for mini-nuclear reactors by 2024, says Rolls-Royce.’ The Telegraph of the UK. 19
April 2021. telegraph.co.uk/business/2022/04/19/green-light-mini-nuclear-reactors-2024-says-rolls-royce/
[22] Bloomberg News. ‘Nuclear fusion could rescue the plant from climate catastrophe.’ 29 September 2019. bloomberg.com/news/features/2019-09-28/startups-take-aim-at-nuclear-fusion-energy-s-biggest-challenge. For the same mass of material, fusion produces four times more energy than fission. International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor, or ITER, Project. ‘Advantages of fusion.’ Undated. iter.org/sci/Fusion
[23] ITER Newsline. JET makes history, again.’ 14 February 2022. org/newsline/-/3722
[24] Massachusetts Institute of Technology. ‘MIT-designed project achieves major advance towards fusion energy.’ 8 September 2021. news.mit.edu/2021/MIT-CFS-major-advance-toward-fusion-energy-0908
[25] National Ignition Facility. ‘National Ignition Facility experiment puts researchers at threshold of fusion ignition.’ 18 August 2021. llnl.gov/news/national-ignition-facility-experiment-puts-researchers-threshold-fusion-ignition
[26] ‘Russia’s army turns Ukraine’s largest nuclear plant into a military base.’ The Wall Street Journal. 5 July 2022. wsj.com/articles/russian-army-turns-ukraines-largest-nuclear-plant-into-a-military-base-11657035694
[27] John Kampfner. ‘Why Germans do it better.’ Atlantic Books. Paperback edition 2021. Pages 252 to 253.
[28] Infosec. ‘Cyberattacks against nuclear plants: A disconcerting threat.’ 14 October 2016. resources.infosecinstitute.com/topic/cyber-attacks-against-nuclear-plants-a-disconcerting-threat/
[29] Public opposition to waste solutions is always a hurdle. See ‘The nuclear power dilemma: Where to put the lethal waste.’ The big read. The Financial Times. 6 February 2022. ft.com/content/246dad82-c107-4886-9be2-e3b3c4c4f315
[30] See ‘Why Germany is resisting calls to ease energy crunch by restarting nuclear power.’ 20 April 2022. Germany along with Austria, Denmark, Luxemburg and Portugal even opposed the EU adding nuclear to the taxonomy. ft.com/content/229c21c7-991c-4b44-a2f9-20991670a4ba
[31] ITER Project. ‘What is fusion?’ and ‘What is a tokamak?’ sections. iter.org/proj/inafewlines#3
[32] Britannica. ‘Arthur Eddington, British scientist.’ britannica.com/biography/Arthur-Eddington
[33] Rivka Galchen. ‘Can nuclear fusion put the brakes on climate change?’ The New Yorker. 4 October 2021. newyorker.com/magazine/2021/10/11/can-nuclear-fusion-put-the-brakes-on-climate-change
[34] Daniel Andruczuyk, associate research professor, nuclear, plasma and radiological engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. ‘Will nuclear fusion ever power the world?’ 28 December 2021. gizmodo.com/will-nuclear-fusion-ever-power-the-world-1848149991.
Another ITER mission – one set to start in 2035 – is to determine the feasibility of producing tritium within the vacuum vessel because the world supply of this scarce and radioactive isotope of hydrogen is insufficient to cover the needs of future power plants. ITER aims to provide an opportunity “to test mock-up in-vessel tritium breeding blankets in a real fusion environment” while showing that control of the plasma and the fusion reactions have “negligible consequences to the environment”. WIRED> ‘Nuclear fusion is already facing a fuel crisis.’ 28 May 2022. wired.com/story/nuclear-fusion-is-already-facing-a-fuel-crisis/ and ITER. Op cit. ‘What will ITER do?’ section. iter.org/proj/inafewlines#3.
Michael Collins is an investment specialist at Magellan. Since 2000, Michael has worked as an investment specialist/commentator for money managers, AMP Capital, IOOF/Perennial, Barclays Global Investors (now BlackRock) and Fidelity International.
The daily resource for hands-on investors. Market insights and investment ideas delivered free to your inbox.
Copyright 2020 Informed Investor Pty Ltd ABN 42 162 871 589. All rights reserved. No portion of this website maybe reproduced, copied or in any way released without written permission. Share Cafe is a Corporate Authorised Representative (001283561) of Sequoia Asset Management Pty Limited who holds an Australian Financial Services Licence (Number: 341506)
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Contact | Advertise
Kazia Therapeutics (KZA) announced yesterday morning that paxalisib did not meet the threshold to move into stage 2 of the GBM AGILE clinical trial (NCT03970447). The study was an adaptive trial designed to assess the potential of new therapeutics to treat the highly aggressive brain cancer glioblastoma (GBM) in a cost-effective manner. Demonstrating efficacy in GBM is an extremely high hurdle as shown by the fact that there is only one approved drug for the disease, temozolomide, and it is only effective in 1/3 of patients.
Given the high nature of the hurdle, in our original initiating coverage report on KZA, we only gave paxalisib a small chance of returning a positive result from the overall study. That is the nature of drug development with one group estimating only 6% to 7% of new chemical entities that commence clinical trials reach launch (Dowden & Munro (2019) Nat Rev Drug Discov). The small percentage that do make it to launch, however, more than make up for the cash spent on those that don’t.
Please prove you are human by selecting the House .
Terracom will report their FY2022 results in September 2022. In the last two months there have been a number of company announcements that have given us improved visibility on our earnings forecasts and valuation metrics so we have taken this opportunity to update our numbers.
With the combination of geopolitical factors in the northern hemisphere as well as disruption from other supply regions, we believe the visibility on export coal prices over the next 12 months has also improved since our March note.
Please prove you are human by selecting the Plane .
Based on our current forecasts, we derive a DCF equity value for SGI of $0.33 per share, with potential upside if full synergies can be extracted. We note SGI is currently trading on very undemanding forward multiples.
Please prove you are human by selecting the Heart .
Please prove you are human by selecting the Plane .
Lake Resources (LKE. ASX) – LKE has signed two non-binding MOU’s in the space of 10 days. Ford Company (Ford) has signed an MOU for ~25,000t/year and last week Hanwa, a Japanese commodity trader signed a MOU for up to 25,000t/year. Subject to execution, this is an amazing feat as Ford and Hanwa are prepared to enter into longer-term strategic partnerships with LKE. Commercial negotiations are still ongoing but are expected, especially if Ford & Hanwa inject new equity into LKE, to further de-risk the project financing & thus ensure LKE and Kachi are fully funded.
Please prove you are human by selecting the Tree .
TNG Ltd is an ASX-listed technology owner and developer of the world-class Mount Peake near-surface vanadiferous titanomagnetite deposit. To unlock value, TNG will concentrate ore from its central Northern Territory mine for processing through its patented TIVAN® process produce three premium quality revenue streams: hi-purity vanadium pentoxide (V2O5) for steel alloys and Vanadium Redox Flow batteries, a quality titanium pigment for paints and a premium steel input with >64%Fe iron ore fines.
Please prove you are human by selecting the Car .
Two recent gravity surveys have considerably exceeded expectations and revealed potential for extensions to the existing MRE at Lake Throssell, plus a material growth opportunity at Lake Yeo. This reinforces the potential for a multi-decade, Tier-1 SOP production hub based around Lake Throssell.
TMG is currently completing work towards the PFS due early 2023, including drilling to start in Q3 2022, evaporation trials and permitting activities. Results from these programs will support the PFS and any future resource upgrade.
Benchmark SOP prices have risen to ~US$940/t due to recent geopolitical developments. The Oct 2021 Scoping Study assumed a SOP price of US$550/t and contained a sensitivity analysis showing every 10% increase in price drives a +$144m increase in the project NPV of $364m. The c.70% increase above the Scoping Study thus implies a project NPV of ~$1.4bn.
First Name (required) Last Name (required) Email Address (required) SMSF Broker Financial Adviser Please prove you are human by selecting the Star .
Please prove you are human by selecting the Star .
The news being reported about the performance of biotechnology has been dour, to say the least, for some time now. Those dour articles have been deserved with the iShares Biotechnology Exchange-Traded Fund down 25% and the SPDR® S&P® Biotech ETF is down 45% from their highs. However, those articles are backward-looking, and successful investors need to be looking forward.
Recently, however, an article in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery caught our eye which we believe should point the way forward for the vast majority of Australian biotechnology investors. This article indicates that, at least, two companies, Antisense Therapeutics (ANP) and Kazia Therapeutics (KZA), are right in the sweet spot in terms of the future of drug development.
Please prove you are human by selecting the Flag .
Please prove you are human by selecting the Cup .
Despite the lower realised oil and gas price, which fell by 5.4% and 19.7% respectively in August, Calima managed to show improvement in its key business metrics.
We expect higher production in November due to the contribution by the new Thorsby wells which will be drilled in August/September which will see Calima meet its 2021 production guidance of 4,500 boe/d.
Please prove you are human by selecting the House .
WT Financial Group Limited (WTL) is a growing diversified financial services company, founded in 2010 and listed on the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) in 2015. Its advice and product offerings are delivered primarily through a group of independent financial advisers operating as authorised representatives of WTL under its Wealth Today Pty Ltd (Wealth Today) and Sentry Group Pty Ltd (Sentry Group) dealer group operations. It has around 275 advisers across more than 200 financial advice practices Australia-wide. It also operates a direct-to-consumer operation under its Spring Financial Group brand.
Please prove you are human by selecting the Heart .
In May 2021, Corporate Connect analyst Marc Sinatra published a comprehensive research report on ASX-listed biotech Immutep Ltd (ASX: IMM). So impressed was he with IMM that Corporate Connect felt it imperative that a follow-up report be released placing a valuation on the company, because the market was not seeing the vast potential of eftilagimod alpha (efti).
This follow-up report has been released today. Using comparables, after adding cash back to their EV estimate and dividing by the total number of issued shares, Corporate Connect now places the fair value of an Immutep share at $A2.20.
Please prove you are human by selecting the Tree .
Phillips 66 (PSX) has entered into an agreement with NVX to acquire 77.9m new shares for US$150m (A$203m). PSX is the worlds largest producer of speciality petroleum coke a precursor for battery grade synthetic graphite anode materials found with an Enterprise Value of US$47.5Bn and assets of US$57Bn.
Please prove you are human by selecting the Key .
PayGroup (PYG) delivers multi-country BPO services and cloud SaaS HCM solutions, assisting companies to manage employees in multiple, complex jurisdictions. The company has many growth opportunities, including new clients, new jurisdictions, new products, partner expansion, and new revenue sources. PYG’s scalable business model allows operating leverage and with savings from in-housing third party technology, support margin expansion.
Please prove you are human by selecting the Flag .
OpenLearning (OLL) is a higher education technology company that operates a scalable online learning platform through a software-as-a-service (SaaS) business model and provides a global marketplace of high quality courses for learners of all levels. Its primary customers are education providers based in Australia and South-East Asia (primarily Malaysia). OLL started operations in Australia in 2012 and expanded to Malaysia in 2015, Singapore in 2018, and recently also Indonesia.
Please prove you are human by selecting the Flag .